In what scenario would a boil order not be necessary?

A boil order is typically issued to ensure public safety in scenarios where there is a potential risk of contamination in the drinking water supply. When there is no contamination suspected, it indicates that the water is believed to be safe for consumption. This absence of suspected contamination means that the water has not been compromised in a way that would lead to harmful pathogens or pollutants being present.

In this case, the community can continue using the water without the precautionary measure of boiling it, which is specifically meant to kill any potentially harmful microorganisms. Therefore, under these circumstances, a boil order is not deemed necessary.

Factors like water clarity or service pressure can indicate issues with the water system, but they do not directly connect to the need for a boil order unless they suggest contamination. Additionally, water quality exceeding standards is generally a positive indicator; however, this does not directly negate the need for a boil order if there were other concerns previously identified. Thus, the absence of contamination suspicion clearly supports the rationale for not issuing a boil order.